Working template

Service ownership map

A companion to A technology operating model for a small investment firm.

Download the text file to fill it in with your own details, or print a blank copy.

Use one row per important service. Start with the workflows whose interruption would have the greatest effect. One person may hold several roles; name the role anyway.

Review owner:   Review date:  

Inputs used: application and vendor inventory, the identity provider's application list, the renewal calendar, and the latest recovery and incident records. Ownership recorded without these sources is a guess; mark it as one.

Ownership map

Workflow / service Tier (1 critical, 2 important, 3 convenience) Business owner Technical owner Alternate for each role Support and escalation Recovery owner Evidence / last checked

Tier definitions used:   (state the interruption length or consequence that separates each tier)

Dependencies behind each Tier 1 service

Service Depends on (identity, network, vendor, data source, integration) Authoritative data held Administrative access recovery path Renewal / contract date

Monthly review agenda

  1. Review interruptions, near misses, and unresolved support issues.
  2. Inspect changes to access, dependencies, and ownership.
  3. Review the latest recovery and service-health evidence, including its limits.
  4. Look ahead to renewals, migrations, staffing changes, and new integrations.
  5. Assign the decisions and follow-up work below.
Decision or gap Business consequence Decision owner Next action Due date Closure evidence

Pass criteria for the map itself

  • [ ] Every Tier 1 service has a named alternate for each role, not only a primary.
  • [ ] Every Tier 1 service has an administrative access recovery path that does not depend on one person's device or mailbox.
  • [ ] Each row's evidence was checked within the stated review period; older rows are marked stale.
  • [ ] Ownership changes since the last review trace to a staffing, vendor, or project change.
  • [ ] Services with no business owner are listed for an adoption or retirement decision.
  • [ ] The map itself is stored where the alternates can reach it when ordinary systems are unavailable.
  • [ ] A new service is added only after a readiness check records its owner, monitoring, recovery path, access model, and budget line.

Handover check: Ask another operator to find the support path and recovery instructions for one service using this map. Record any missing information and its owner.

Common failure modes

  • The map is created once and not re-read until an outage.
  • The owner recorded is whoever set up the service, not whoever depends on it.
  • Alternates are named but have never signed in or read the runbook.
  • Vendor-managed services are treated as needing no internal owner.

Review cadence / next full refresh:  

This map records who is responsible; it does not establish that recovery works. Use the recovery exercise scorecard for that evidence.